The Spark Comes from the Side

The spark is not a bolt from nowhere. It comes from the side. Anyone who keeps thinking straight ahead inside a blocked frame grows more diligent, not more new.

The formula is older than Koestler, and it belongs to Paul Souriau. To find ideas on a given subject, one must think beside it: penser à côté (Souriau, 1881). Koestler took the sentence up and rendered it as thinking aside. To invent is not to push harder on the same track. It is to leave the track.

Koestler called the moment bisociation: not one idea in one matrix, but the sudden meeting of two independent matrices (Koestler, 1964). Two games that did not know each other touch. A third thing appears. The chronicle of discovery he gathers is full of arrivals at the unexpected destination. One looks for India and finds America.

This is not mysticism. It is the narrowness of the conscious beam. Koestler separates two unconsciouses that keep being confused. One sinks mastered skills downward: habit, virtuosity, automaton. The other rises from the fringe, from the halo around a thought. Those who know only the first take creation for chance. Those who celebrate only the second forget the preparation. Pasteur stays, in Koestler, in the room: chance favors the prepared.

Poincaré described the combinations themselves. To invent is to choose. The most fruitful draw their elements from widely separated fields. Most are useless. The few that hold are also the most beautiful. Not because beauty is ornament. Because a sense of rightness is the sieve, before proof arrives (Poincaré, 1908). Logic verifies. It rarely invents.

That is why language is often too late, and sometimes too exact. Words crystallize thought. A crystal no longer flows. Koestler brings in Kekulé, Faraday, Einstein: thinking happens in images, movements, lines of force. Words come afterwards. He calls this a step back that prepares the leap: reculer pour mieux sauter. Making knows the same move. When the brief becomes a straitjacket, the same question, only louder, will not help.

Dorst put this into practice. Frame creation does not apply old methods to new problems. It creates another approach (Dorst, 2015). That is Koestler in the studio: not harder at the same game, but laying a second game beside it until the two touch.

At SOL LAB we keep this side-step open. The spark does not sit in a method. It sits where two things that owe each other nothing suddenly fit.

What lies underneath is simple: not straight ahead. From the side.

Sources 
Souriau, P. (1881). Théorie de l'invention. Hachette.
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. Hutchinson / Macmillan. German: Der göttliche Funke. Scherz, 1966. Poincaré, H. (1908). L'invention mathématique. L'Enseignement Mathématique, 10. English: Mathematical creation. The Monist, 20(3), 1910. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/20.3.321 Dorst, K. (2015). Frame Innovation. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10096.001.0001


Previous
Previous

Design as Checkbox

Next
Next

The line becomes a vessel